The debates

Did he push India towards the bomb?

In 1959 he told a parliamentary committee India could build nuclear weapons without outside help. After China’s test in October 1964 he urged the government to approve a bomb programme. On All India Radio he said atomic weapons give a state “a deterrent power against attack from a much stronger State”. His cost estimate left out reactors and reprocessing. He held secret talks with US officials in 1964 and 1965 on nuclear explosives. A Business Standard reviewer calls him hawkish on peaceful nuclear explosions.

In 1960 he wrote that India should make plutonium for peaceful purposes “but not convert it into bombs”. In April 1964 he told Shastri that no paper had proposed making weapons. In London he said he did not expect a decision to test. He left the decision to the cabinet and in 1965 raised his estimate to at least five years. M. G. K. Menon rejected the charge that his stance was ambivalent. Even Dadabhoy, who shows him preparing quietly, frames it as readiness for a bomb that might one day be needed.

Wikipedia: Homi J. Bhabha · Atomic Heritage Foundation: Indian Nuclear Program · Wilson Center: Hawks and Doves, China’s first nuclear test and Indian nuclear thought (25 September 2017) · Business Standard: Anglophile scientist, ardent nationalist (31 May 2023) · The Wire: Homi Bhabha, Jawaharlal Nehru and the bomb (25 April 2023)

Was the 1966 crash sabotage?

Theories have followed the crash for decades. A 2008 book by Gregory Douglas, Conversations with the Crow, claims a CIA officer named Robert Crowley spoke of a bomb in the cargo hold. The Swiss climber Daniel Roche argues the plane collided with another aircraft. Debris that surfaces from the glacier keeps the questions alive.

The French inquiry found pilot error. The captain left Beirut knowing one VOR receiver was unserviceable. He misjudged his position against Mont Blanc and misread the radar controller’s correction. He kept descending into the mountain. The inquiry ruled out an interception. Douglas is described as a conspiracy theorist and forger, and no independent source supports the Crowley claim.

ThePrint: Sabotage or accident? The theories about how India lost Homi Bhabha (24 January 2018) · ThePrint: Mystery of 1966 Air India crash that killed Bhabha (27 July 2020) · Wikipedia: Air India Flight 101 · Wikipedia: Homi J. Bhabha

Too optimistic about nuclear power?

A Business Standard reviewer says he was too optimistic about cheap nuclear electricity and that resources were misallocated as a result. Virendra Singh of TIFR calls his Geneva forecast on fusion unduly optimistic.

The plan was built on India’s own resources. He cited over 500,000 tons of thorium against uranium of less than a tenth of that. Coal lay far from most demand and hydropower hung on the monsoon. The natural-uranium and heavy-water experience of CIRUS led to India’s pressurised heavy water reactors. Self-reliance was the point as much as cost.

Business Standard: Anglophile scientist, ardent nationalist (31 May 2023) · Virendra Singh (TIFR): Homi Jehangir Bhabha, Architect of Modern Science and Technology in India (2009) · Wikipedia: Homi J. Bhabha · Department of Atomic Energy: A brief history · Bhabha Atomic Research Centre: About BARC

Elitism and the AEC model

The AEC had full executive and financial powers modelled on the Railway Board. Historian George Perkovich called his bond with Nehru “friendly and symbiotic” and not a real check. Nuclear policy was little debated in Parliament. A Business Standard reviewer calls him an anglophile patrician with easy access to power. The same review says infighting among scientists limited the spread of higher education.

Indira Chowdhury argues his focus on a small selective group looked elitist but was what research quality required. He set up the BARC Training School to widen the pool of trained scientists and engineers. TIFR drew visitors such as Dirac and Bethe. Both TIFR and BARC have outlived him by six decades.

British Journal for the History of Science: Unfriendly guardians, India’s first nuclear leadership change in 1966 (2021) · Wikipedia: Homi J. Bhabha · Business Standard: Anglophile scientist, ardent nationalist (31 May 2023) · Bhāvanā: Review of Growing the Tree of Science (April 2018) · Bhabha Atomic Research Centre: About BARC · Founding Fuel: The birth of a model scientific institute (15 May 2021)

How much credit is his alone?

He is often called the father of India’s nuclear programme. Yet the 1974 test came eight years after his death. Raja Ramanna led BARC after him. Vikram Sarabhai built the space programme and succeeded him at the AEC in 1966. Raman, Saha and others also shaped Indian science in his time.

INCOSPAR was set up under Sarabhai in 1962 largely on his initiative and the AEC funded early space work. Reviewers credit him with the groundwork for the 1974 test. The DAE calls him the architect of India’s atomic energy programme. Virendra Singh of TIFR calls him the architect of modern science and technology in India.

Atomic Heritage Foundation: Indian Nuclear Program · British Journal for the History of Science: Unfriendly guardians, India’s first nuclear leadership change in 1966 (2021) · Business Standard: Anglophile scientist, ardent nationalist (31 May 2023) · Virendra Singh (TIFR): Homi Jehangir Bhabha, Architect of Modern Science and Technology in India (2009) · Department of Atomic Energy: A brief history · Wikipedia: Homi J. Bhabha

Overview · Life · Ideas · Books · Videos · Debates · People I learn from